<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet href='http://feed.feedsky.com/styles/temp01.xsl' type='text/xsl' ?><!--这是一个由Feedsy提供技术支持的Feed，为了提高读者阅读的体验，以及满足用户美化自己Feed的需要，我们设计了多种精美的Feed模板，提供给大家选择，所有最终呈现出来的样式，皆由用户自愿选择使用，未经许可，任何团体和个人，请不要擅自修改样式或者盗用，这是对于用户选择权的尊重。--><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:fs="http://www.feedsky.com/namespace/feed" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><atom:link href="http://feed.feedsky.com/Economix" type="application/rss+xml" rel="self"></atom:link><fs:self_link href="http://feed.feedsky.com/Economix" type="application/rss+xml"></fs:self_link><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:00:34 GMT</lastBuildDate><title>Economix</title><description>New York Times Blog</description><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/</link><sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod><sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><language>en</language><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:59:27 GMT</pubDate><item><title>Snow Job</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/snow-job/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/snow-job/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>A Dartmouth College study finds that ski resorts exaggerate snowfall -- especially on weekends -- but skiers are wise to it.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605712639/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/snow-job/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>Dartmouth</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Skiing</category><category>snow</category><category>weather</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 22:00:34 +0800</pubDate><author>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/snow-job/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144497</guid><dc:creator>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/snow-job/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605712639/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Why Tax Policy Assumes People Are Richer Than They Think</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/why-tax-policy-assumes-people-are-richer-than-they-think/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/why-tax-policy-assumes-people-are-richer-than-they-think/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>Because of the different ways in which income is defined, tax policy often assumes people to be better off than they themselves think they are, an economist writes.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605674245/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/why-tax-policy-assumes-people-are-richer-than-they-think/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>low-income</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>_featured</category><category>deductions</category><category>Income Tax</category><category>Joint Committee on Taxation</category><category>capital gains</category><category>Today’s Economist</category><category>Income</category><category>Daily Economist</category><category>Taxation</category><category>Bruce Bartlett</category><category>middle class</category><category>high-income</category><category>adjusted gross income</category><category>home-mortgage deduction</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:00:00 +0800</pubDate><author>By BRUCE BARTLETT</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/why-tax-policy-assumes-people-are-richer-than-they-think/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144241</guid><dc:creator>By BRUCE BARTLETT</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/14/why-tax-policy-assumes-people-are-richer-than-they-think/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605674245/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Financial Literacy: 'Pretty Dismal'</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/financial-literacy-pretty-dismal/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/financial-literacy-pretty-dismal/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>A report finds that citizens of several countries share a meager understanding of basic financial concepts that underpin decisions about mortgages, saving for retirement, credit card borrowing and other economic needs.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605443971/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/financial-literacy-pretty-dismal/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>Uncategorized</category><category>financial literacy</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 04:29:32 +0800</pubDate><author>By MOTOKO RICH</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/financial-literacy-pretty-dismal/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144465</guid><dc:creator>By MOTOKO RICH</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/financial-literacy-pretty-dismal/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605443971/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Expanding a Safety Net Program</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/expanding-a-safety-net-program/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/expanding-a-safety-net-program/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>President Obama's proposed budget would continue the expansion of government benefits for middle-class families by extending the earned income tax credit.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605417010/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/expanding-a-safety-net-program/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>benefits</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>social safety net</category><category>earned income tax credit</category><category>federal budget</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 02:14:20 +0800</pubDate><author>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/expanding-a-safety-net-program/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144419</guid><dc:creator>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/expanding-a-safety-net-program/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605417010/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>The Housing Bust, in One Chart</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/the-housing-bust-in-one-chart/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/the-housing-bust-in-one-chart/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>The price per square foot for homes in 27 areas across the country. in 2006 versus 2011.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605417011/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/the-housing-bust-in-one-chart/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>housing bubble</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>housing prices</category><category>housing</category><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:33:55 +0800</pubDate><author>By CATHERINE RAMPELL</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/the-housing-bust-in-one-chart/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144383</guid><dc:creator>By CATHERINE RAMPELL</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/the-housing-bust-in-one-chart/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605417011/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Who Benefits From the Safety Net</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/who-benefits-from-the-safety-net/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/who-benefits-from-the-safety-net/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>A new study underscores that the poor are no longer the biggest group receiving government benefits.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605386195/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/who-benefits-from-the-safety-net/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>benefits</category><category>Poverty</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>social safety net</category><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:19:38 +0800</pubDate><author>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM and ROBERT GEBELOFF</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/who-benefits-from-the-safety-net/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144307</guid><dc:creator>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM and ROBERT GEBELOFF</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/who-benefits-from-the-safety-net/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605386195/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Raising the Price of Reproductive Rights</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/raising-the-price-of-reproductive-rights/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/raising-the-price-of-reproductive-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>State and local restrictions on abortion have made it harder for women, especially among the poor, to obtain abortions, an economist writes.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/605345927/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/raising-the-price-of-reproductive-rights/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>women in the workforce</category><category>reproductive rights</category><category>Daily Economist</category><category>_featured</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>heatlh care</category><category>abortion</category><category>women</category><category>Roman Catholic Church</category><category>politics</category><category>Nancy Folbre</category><category>Today’s Economist</category><pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:00:16 +0800</pubDate><author>By NANCY FOLBRE</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/raising-the-price-of-reproductive-rights/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144155</guid><dc:creator>By NANCY FOLBRE</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/13/raising-the-price-of-reproductive-rights/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/605345927/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>#FedValentines</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/fedvalentines/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/fedvalentines/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>For once, it would appear that the rest of the world can't resist the lure of economics: The topic is among the most popular subjects of conversation on Twitter right now.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/604629729/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/fedvalentines/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>Twitter</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Vale</category><category>Federal Reserve</category><pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:25:59 +0800</pubDate><author>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/fedvalentines/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144135</guid><dc:creator>By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/fedvalentines/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/604629729/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Good Parent, Bad Parent</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/good-parent-bad-parent/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/good-parent-bad-parent/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>Two economists suggest that wealth, rather than cultural mores, is the bigger determinant of successful parenthood.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/604603136/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/good-parent-bad-parent/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>Poverty</category><category>Uncategorized</category><category>Sendhil Mullainathan</category><category>Saugato Datta</category><category>parents</category><category>social safety net</category><category>poverty trap</category><category>scarcity</category><category>family economics</category><category>behavioral economics</category><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:00:49 +0800</pubDate><author>By CATHERINE RAMPELL</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/good-parent-bad-parent/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144005</guid><dc:creator>By CATHERINE RAMPELL</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/good-parent-bad-parent/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/604603136/5316126</fs:itemid></item><item><title>Swing State Economies</title><link>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/swing-state-economies/</link><wfw:commentRss>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/swing-state-economies/feed/</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><description>If weak state economies keep getting better -- which is not at all certain -- Republicans could be hurt in November, David Leonhardt notes on The Caucus.&lt;img src=&quot;http://www1.feedsky.com/t1/604603142/Economix/feedsky/s.gif?r=http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/swing-state-economies/&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; height=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;position:absolute&quot; /&gt;</description><category>Uncategorized</category><pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:26:28 +0800</pubDate><author>By ECONOMIX EDITORS</author><comments>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/swing-state-economies/#comments</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=144127</guid><dc:creator>By ECONOMIX EDITORS</dc:creator><fs:srclink>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/swing-state-economies/</fs:srclink><fs:srcfeed>http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/?feed=rss2</fs:srcfeed><fs:itemid>feedsky/Economix/~7207018/604603142/5316126</fs:itemid></item></channel></rss>
